The existing structure had many campaigns attracting unwanted clicks from searchers with the wrong intent, leading to low-quality leads and wasted ad spend. To improve cost per conversion, we knew we had to minimise this.
To achieve this, we focused on including more “negative” keywords in our campaigns. These are keywords that prevent an ad from being triggered by a specific word or phrase. By adding negative keywords to the campaign, we can prevent ads from triggering for broad, irrelevant, and low-quality searches such as “free” or “eBay”. This is a regular exercise within our ongoing optimisations to tighten targeting and eliminate wasted spend.
Another critical aspect of the account optimisation was Google Shopping Ads. These ads typically appear within search results above text-based ads and provide the user with a product image and name, price, and shop name.
But that’s just the tip of the iceberg where Shopping Ads are concerned. Unlike ordinary search and display ads, Google Shopping lets you include additional product details, including reviews and real-time sales information (see the “PRICE DROP” example below).
The existing account had few Shopping Ads, and many had been disapproved for not matching Google’s criteria. By resolving these issues, we took the heavy-lifting out of comparison shopping for the searchers and meant we could position Fire & Security Store’s products as the affordable option.
As we continued to fine-tune our approach, we also began to implement test-based campaigns. Using Dynamic Search Ads (which auto-fill’s ads with relevant ad copy and triggers an ad when Google identifies a potential opportunity), we could learn more about the types of searches users were making. This helped us ensure we weren’t missing any gems in our targeted campaigns.